Very similar to the main seeking thread here. I lurk rather than post but do keep up as people get thrown out if they don't contribute.fredflintstone wrote: ↑Thu Jan 03, 2019 10:40 pmHas anyone on here got access to the Seeking.com thread on UKP? I think it has almost 1000 pages now. Just curious as to what kind of stuff is posted on that thread - do they review SA girls or mention barebackers or is it just their usual irrelevant bollocks?
Scammer advice and warnings. General reviews though mainly sharing of profiles is kept to PM due to risk of people outting others and sharing of posts*, lads bragging about success and asking for tips and plenty of sharing of advice for success with girls, hotel tips, and then tips for general use of the seeking site
It's a little cliquey with a few of the more popular/frequent posters setting the tone and general etiquette but I'd say it's much more friendly than UKP in general.
Bareback has been touched upon on there a few times and its not as looked down upon - its accepted that girls on there are not going to be anywhere as near as militant as your normal sex worker and you should act accordingly with them - but the risks are high due to the high sexual activities of all involved. Common sense stuff really. Lads have brough up going bare with regulars and no great shouting down, just at your own risk tone from people.
Though the topic of BB over PM is pretty rife if you word it well and profiles will be shared
*the old forum here I shared a warning about a girl who no showed on me. Led me on and let me knock on some door. Travelled 2 hours to see her and then shared the a post about how shes a time waster not to be trusted when someone mentioned her. They sent her a screenshot of my post. You wonder why people can't hack it on SA and then you realize so many people are fucking divs. In what world is a girl gonna be impressed by someone white knighting and telling her the info is on a bareback punting forum.